Agent Architecture: How Software Is Learning to Drive
The Shift From Smarter Models to Systems That Can Act, Adapt, and Be Trusted
Software is undergoing the same transition autonomous vehicles did a decade ago: moving from assisted operation to independent action. This post explores why the next breakthrough in AI agents isn’t smarter models, but the infrastructure layers — planning, memory, tooling, observability, and safety — that allow autonomous systems to operate reliably in the real world.
Start Investing With the AI Infrastructure and Tools Syndicate Today
Take 5 seconds. No document uploads.
A decade ago, self-driving cars still felt like fixtures of science fiction. Today, getting into a car with no one behind the wheel feels almost normal. That same shift is now happening in software: we are moving from copilots that respond to prompts to systems that can independently pursue goals. Gartner predicts 40% of enterprise applications will embed task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from <5% in 2025.
The real breakthrough across industries is software that can decide what to do next, moment by moment, and recover when something unexpected happens — without human input. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: most agent failures have little to do with model intelligence. They fail because they lose context, misuse tools, can’t explain their decisions, or repeat the same mistakes indefinitely. As models’ reasoning skills have strengthened, the bottleneck has shifted from intelligence to architecture.
Just as cloud infrastructure underpinned the last wave of software innovation, agent infrastructure will define the next. AWS didn’t win by offering raw compute alone; it built distinct layers for networking, storage, identity, and orchestration, each addressing a specific failure mode at scale. Agentic systems require a similar unbundling. Planning, memory, tool use, execution, observability, and safety cannot live in a single monolithic layer if we expect software to operate autonomously, recover gracefully, and earn trust in production.
Agents must be built to plan, take actions, and maintain context independently, accurately, and safely. For the modern enterprise, success hinges on the sophistication of this underlying infrastructure. In this post, we’ll map out the five core components of the agentic ecosystem and look at the startups building the “control plane” for this new era of autonomy.
The Architecture of an Agent
What does it actually take to build a successful agent? Most experimental agents follow a simple perception-decision-action cycle. But in the messy, unpredictable real world, where APIs fail and context windows overflow, that elegant loop often breaks. To move from a “cool demo” to a “production-ready” system, five components are non-negotiable.
The Building Blocks
The infrastructure beneath should be just as sophisticated as the agent itself. A diverse ecosystem of startups is emerging to provide these specialized layers.
Start Investing With the AI Infrastructure and Tools Syndicate Today
Take 5 seconds. No document uploads.
The defining characteristic. The model determines the steps, understands the context, and recognizes when a task is finished or has failed.
An orchestration layer, or control plane, manages the flow between thinking and doing. What began as simple task-chaining has evolved into systems that coordinate multiple agents, models, and tools within a single, stateful workflow.
- Home
Developer Frameworks:
Tools like LangChain (increasingly via LangGraph) and CrewAI enable stateful, multi-step workflows and coordination across specialized agents. As adoption matures, these frameworks are moving beyond abstractions to support governance, lifecycle management, and cross-system interoperability. - Home
No-Code Solutions:
Platforms such as n8n, Lindy, and Relay allow teams to visually compose agent workflows and lower the barrier to experimentation and deployment for non-engineers. - Home
Model Routing:
As cost and latency tradeoffs become material, solutions like Martian and OpenRouter make intelligent model selection a native part of orchestration. They dynamically route tasks to the most appropriate model.
Looking ahead, orchestration is evolving into a full “Agent OS,” where agents are treated as a coordinated workforce rather than isolated tools. We expect rapid adoption of multi-agent systems, with “puppeteer” orchestrators coordinating specialized agents such as researcher, coder, and validator across end-to-end workflows. As orchestration shifts from general-purpose frameworks to verticalized, workflow-aware platforms, enterprises will favor production-grade systems with native governance, agent lifecycle management, and standardized interoperability such as the Model Context Protocol.
Agents need a “scratchpad” (short-term memory) to track multi-step processes and a “library” (long-term memory) to learn from past mistakes.
While short-term memory is relatively straightforward, storing and retrieving long-term information reliably remains a core challenge for agents.
- Home
State Machines:
Temporal treats memory as an explicit workflow state, like a save file in a video game that lets you pick up exactly where you left off. - Home
Knowledge Graphs:
Zep builds semantic networks that link past interactions. Think of it as building a mind map rather than just logging events. - Home
Selective Recall:
Letta and Mem0 prioritize relevance over completeness. Similar to how humans remember the important parts of a conversation, not a verbatim transcript.
We’re excited by emerging architectures that enable continual learning without catastrophic forgetting. We expect vector databases and event-centric logic maps to dominate context over the coming years. Agents will increasingly “remember” customer histories, prior failures, and procedural knowledge across interactions and drive self-improvement and multi-step reliability at scale.
Without APIs, databases, and code execution environments, an agent is just a brain in a jar: able to think about actions but unable to execute them.
To act in the world, agents rely on tools that bridge language models with external systems and environments.
- Home
Browsing and Search:
Tools like Tavily, Exa, and Browserbase allow agents to explore the web, run structured searches, and retrieve fresh information beyond static training data. - Home
Code Execution:
Secure runtimes such as E2B and LastMile AI provide isolated sandboxes where agents can write, execute, and iterate on code without risking production systems. - Home
Connectors:
Platforms including Composio, Arcade, and Anon handle authentication, permissions, and API integrations to enable agents to interact reliably with third-party applications and services.
Agents will act more deeply in the real world as tools expand into both digital and physical domains (e.g., robots, drones, ERP/CRM systems). We also expect growth in specialized, multi-modal tools (vision and action) and agent-to-agent commerce. Overall, tooling is shifting from “nice-to-have” to foundational, with emphasis on secure, low-latency execution across hybrid environments.
Because autonomous behavior is inherently unpredictable, organizations need a “glass box” recording system in the form of execution traces and decision logs. This allows them to understand why an agent chose a particular path and to trust that it is doing its job accurately.
Transparent, debuggable, and auditable agent behavior is essential for enterprise adoption.
- Home
Simulation and Evaluation:
Platforms like Coval and Braintrust enable teams to simulate agent behavior, run large-scale evaluations, and continuously measure performance, reliability, and regressions pre- and post-deployment. - Home
Agent-Specific Monitoring:
Tools such as AgentOps and Arize provide visibility into multi-step execution, including traces, tool usage, latency, and failure modes, and help teams diagnose issues and improve system behavior over time.
Observability is now table stakes, with most organizations prioritizing detailed tracing across steps, tool calls, and decisions. Unlike traditional software with deterministic outputs, agents make probabilistic decisions across multi-step workflows, making post-hoc debugging nearly impossible without comprehensive tracing. Looking ahead, we expect mature platforms to offer multi-agent dashboards that visualize swarms, latency, errors, and costs in real time.
Autonomy without guardrails is a non-starter in the enterprise. Everything from role-based access controls to human-in-the-loop approvals for high-stakes decisions needs to be in place.
As agents gain autonomy and access to internal systems, the security surface expands dramatically.
- Home
Adversarial Testing:
Haize Labs focuses on red-teaming agentic systems to surface prompt injection risks, misuse scenarios, and failure modes before production deployment. - Home
Deterministic Controls:
While incumbents like Okta are extending identity and authorization to agents, specialists such as Oso are emerging with fine-grained, deterministic access controls purpose-built for agentic workflows. - Home
Developer Integration:
Descope has become a developer-friendly standard by offering drag-and-drop authentication and authorization components that integrate cleanly into AI-driven applications
Safety has emerged as the make-or-break factor, with agents increasingly viewed as the “new insider threat.” We expect rising attacks (prompt injection, tool misuse) to drive “bounded autonomy” architectures: least-privileged access, human-in-the-loop escalation for high-stakes actions, and governance agents that monitor other agents.
The Future of Autonomous Software
We are still in the earliest innings of this transition. The cloud platform shift was about structure as much as capability, and agent infrastructure will be no different. The architectural choices being made today will set the constraints and capabilities of autonomous software for the next decade.
About Authors
Meera Oak
PartnerPrior to Alumni Ventures, Meera led finance and product initiatives at Yale University. She managed a $1B P&L, led M&A transactions and secured business development relationships with corporate partners. She later led product for a cloud-based ERP implementation giving her the fluency to connect with developers navigating today’s platform shift. Most recently, she worked with early-stage venture funds and incubators like Create Venture Studio and Polymath Capital Partners, launching and sourcing ventures in enterprise SaaS and infrastructure. Meera has a BA in Economics from Swarthmore and an MBA from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth.
Lucy Friedmann
Senior AssociateBefore joining Alumni Ventures, Lucy built her career launching new products at Amazon, first for AWS and then for Amazon Devices. She graduated with honors from Yale University in 2019 and earned a dual MBA/MA from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and the Lauder Institute in 2025, where she focused on finance and European venture capital. A lifelong fencer, she competed all four years on Yale’s varsity team. Now happily retired from the sport, she spends her free time hitting tennis balls with friends and supporting the arts, including her volunteer work with American Ballet Theatre’s Junior Council.
Interested in Seeing Elite Venture Deals (for Free)?
- Home
Easy Sign-Up
Click a button. 5 seconds. - Home
No Obligation to Invest
Only invest in deals you like. - Home
Co-Invest with Elite VCs
Frequent co-investors include a16z, Sequoia, Khosla, Accel, and more. - Home
Deal Transparency
Due Diligence and Investment Memos provided. Live Deal discussions with our investment teams.
This communication is from Alumni Ventures, a for-profit venture capital company that is not affiliated with or endorsed by any school. It is not personalized advice, and AV only provides advice to its client funds. This communication is neither an offer to sell, nor a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any security. Such offers are made only pursuant to the formal offering documents for the fund(s) concerned, and describe significant risks and other material information that should be carefully considered before investing. For additional information, please see here. Achievement of investment objectives, including any amount of investment return, cannot be guaranteed. Co-investors are shown for illustrative purposes only, do not reflect all organizations with which AV co-invests, and do not necessarily indicate future co-investors. Example portfolio companies shown are not available to future investors, except potentially in the case of follow-on investments. Venture capital investing involves substantial risk, including risk of loss of all capital invested. This communication includes forward-looking statements, generally consisting of any statement pertaining to any issue other than historical fact, including without limitation predictions, financial projections, the anticipated results of the execution of any plan or strategy, the expectation or belief of the speaker, or other events or circumstances to exist in the future. Forward-looking statements are not representations of actual fact, depend on certain assumptions that may not be realized, and are not guaranteed to occur. Any forward-looking statements included in this communication speak only as of the date of the communication. AV and its affiliates disclaim any obligation to update, amend, or alter such forward-looking statements, whether due to subsequent events, new information, or otherwise.